忍者ブログ
  • 2017.03
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 2017.05
[PR]
×

[PR]上記の広告は3ヶ月以上新規記事投稿のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書く事で広告が消えます。

【2017/04/28 17:07 】 |
Verification of Tae Kwon Do history

8dc413db.jpgHistory of Koryo
vol 128
Retsuden 41
"手搏戯"





822577fd.jpg
李朝実録風俗関係資料撮要
This book is collection of culture related descriptions from the Annals of Joseon published by the colonial government in 1939.

Daejong 16, vol32
"手搏戯"





d8f3bd78.jpgConfiscation of 51 books.
The colonial government official telegram No69
Dated 19 Nov 1910








2f8f968b.jpg










"Problems in the identity and Philosophy of Taegwondo and Their Historical Causes"
Steven D. Capener, ph. D,
It has been postulated that t'aegwondo is Korea's most effective diplomatic tool, achieving what Korea's most skilled diplomats have been unable to accomplish; that is, bring the citizens of advanced western countries to an attitude of respect before the Korean flag. It has been further argued that t'aegwondo, as the Korean national sport, and one of the repositories of traditional, indigenous Korean culture, plays a vital role in preserving traditional Korean culture in the face of western cultural imperialism.
T'aegwondo, a martial sport, has been given these rather weighty responsibilities because t'aegwondo has been popularized as a unique product of Korean culture, continuously extant in Korean history since the beginning of the Three Kingdoms period, some 1300 years ago. The importance placed on (his history of unique development within Korea is understandable as it provides t'aegwondo with a Korean pedigree (chokpo) granting legitimacy as a traditional Korean institution imbued with an ancient and mysterious past which not only holds great appeal to non-Koreans, but also serves as a source of national pride to Koreans themselves who crave an internationally recognizable symbols of their culture.

The overemphasis on establishing and asserting t'aegwondo's indigenous Korean origins and development, however, has actually been an impediment to t'aegwondo's potential growth and development.
T'aegwondo seems to have reached it's goals of international recognition upon its inclusion as an official sport in the 2000 Sydney Olympics, testimony to the incredible growth of t'aegwondo as a sport in the last 35 years, that t'aegwondo is now grappling with serious philosophic problems, regarding its identity and future development. The main cause of these problems is found in the history of t'aegwondo's origins.
The fact that t'aegwondo was first brought into Korea from Japan in the form of Japanese karate around the time of the liberation of Korea from Japanese colonial rule, and the way this fact has been dealt with in Korea has left many serious inconsistencies in the way t'aegwondo has been development within Korea and propagated abroad.... The concept of martial art based on the Chinese philosophical concept of tao was developed in Japan beginning with the transformation of swordmanship from a battlefield necessity to a form of philosophic human movement.
This philosophical concept, as it was applied to fighting skills by the Japanese, did not exist in Korea.
Rather, during the last half of the Choson dynasty, physical activity, especially of a martial nature, became all object of scorn and a sign of low breeding as seen in the royal court attitude of valuing learning and disregarding martial skill.

Koreans' first concrete exposure to this concept of martial art was through the martial arts training judo and kendo under the militaristic education policy effected by the Japanese during the colonial period.
This concept was reinforced with the entry of karate into Korea.
The propagation of the philosophies associated with karate flourished as did many other Japanese policies and methodologies.
This was especially true in the sport and physical education realms as can be seen by the fact that the faculty of the physical education department of Seoul National University at that time consisted almost exclusively of Japanese trained educators whose teaching and training methods were exclusively Japanese.
http://www.americanmoodokwan.com/Capener_Essay%28W-95%29.pdf
 
PR
【2011/09/28 08:03 】 | Uriginal Issue | 有り難いご意見(0) | トラックバック(0)
<<Angus Hamiltonの本について | ホーム | 韓国武術捏造史パターンを探る>>
有り難いご意見
貴重なご意見の投稿














虎カムバック
トラックバックURL

<<前ページ | ホーム | 次ページ>>